Effective in 2014
The ACA's major market reforms changed how individual and fully insured small group rates are built.
A practical reference for understanding how the ACA changed individual and fully insured small group rating, which factors carriers may still use, which factors are off limits, and why certain clients look for alternatives.
The ACA's major market reforms changed how individual and fully insured small group rates are built.
Age, geography, family composition, tobacco, and wellness remain. Health status, gender, industry, and group size are generally out for ACA small group.
Rates became more similar than they were under pre-ACA underwriting, but premiums can still differ significantly.
Fully insured may help some groups, while level-funded, transitional, or other options may help others.
Before 2014, small group pricing in Texas could reflect both case characteristics and risk characteristics. MACR changed the rating conversation by removing many of those variables for ACA-compliant individual and fully insured small group plans.
Carriers could consider characteristics such as age, gender, location, industry, and group size. Underwriters could also consider medical conditions, claims history, and other risk characteristics, which could lead to a large rate-up after the initial quote.
For ACA-compliant fully insured small group plans, carriers could no longer rate a group based on industry, group size, gender, medical conditions, claims experience, or other health-status factors. The quote became more predictable, but not always cheaper.
These are the core rating rules for ACA-compliant individual and fully insured small group coverage. Texas uses the federal age curve and CMS-approved rating areas.
A carrier cannot rate up one small group because that group had claims. Instead, the carrier prices its block. Each issuer has one individual-market risk pool and one small-group risk pool in the state.
Small group carriers may still offer composite or average rates, but the underlying premium is built from per-member rates and then converted into composite tiers.
The old Texas system helps explain why MACR created winners and losers. Many of the old Texas rating statutes still exist, but they are dormant where federal ACA rules preempt them.
| Step or factor | Pre-ACA Texas approach | Why it mattered |
|---|---|---|
| Group size | Up to 20% variation was allowed. | Smaller groups could be priced higher even with the same average age. |
| Industry | Industry classification could create up to 15% variation. | Higher-risk industries could start with higher base rates. |
| Age and gender | Wide age and gender spreads were common in practice. | Younger males, older females, and healthier groups often benefited from the old rules. |
| Location | Rates reflected geographic cost differences and provider contracts. | Geography still matters under MACR, but now through CMS-approved rating areas. |
| Medical underwriting | Rates could vary from the index rate, creating a roughly 67% top-to-bottom spread. | A $300 base rate could become about $500 after underwriting. |
| Renewal risk load | Additional risk adjustment could apply at renewal. | A group's own claims or conditions could continue to affect renewal pricing. |
Texas now has 27 CMS-approved rating areas for individual and small group market rating.
Texas law permits tobacco rating up to the federal maximum, but small group carrier practice varies. The small group wellness-program escape must be considered.
Texas health group cooperatives are a useful local comparison point when discussing association-style coverage concepts.
The simplest rule: MACR applies to ACA-compliant individual coverage and fully insured small group coverage. It does not apply to every health coverage arrangement an agent may discuss.
| Coverage or arrangement | Subject to MACR? | Course takeaway |
|---|---|---|
| Individual major medical | Yes | Guaranteed issue, community-rated, and affected by individual market risk-pool dynamics. |
| ACA-compliant fully insured small group | Yes | The main focus of the class. These plans use the limited rating factors discussed above. |
| Grandfathered plans | No | They avoid many 2014 reforms but are rare and generally locked into old plan designs. |
| Transitional / grandmothered plans | No | They avoided certain 2014 reforms and continue while CMS and the state permit renewal. |
| Large group | No | Large group coverage is not rated under the small group MACR rules. |
| Self-insured / level-funded | No | These arrangements can use underwriting and broader case/risk characteristics, subject to other compliance rules. |
| Association health plans | In flux | The 2018 AHP rule was rescinded. It is unknown whether this option will be re-introduced under the second Trump administration. |
| No Participation / No Contribution window | Yes | This can solve participation or contribution issues, but it does not avoid MACR pricing. |
MACR did not make all groups pay the same amount. It narrowed the rating range by removing many old factors. As premiums rise, even a fixed percentage difference can become a bigger dollar difference.
The goal is not to push every client away from fully insured coverage. The goal is to understand which rule set helps the client and which rule set hurts the client.
Fully insured ACA small group coverage can be attractive for groups that would have been punished under the old rules, especially groups with older or less healthy populations.
Level-funded coverage may be worth quoting for younger, healthier groups that are willing to go through underwriting and accept the added compliance and funding considerations.
Grandfathered and transitional plans can still be valuable, but the trade-off is limited flexibility. The employer may be locked into the same plan design year after year.
At the client level, helping a healthy group find a lower-cost alternative may be the right recommendation. At the market level, when healthier groups leave the community-rated pool, the remaining pool can become less healthy and more expensive. Good advice means helping the client in front of you while understanding how the broader risk pool is affected.
Some options avoid MACR entirely. Others do not avoid MACR but solve a different problem, such as participation or contribution.
Plans in place before March 23, 2010 may avoid many 2014 reforms, but material changes can jeopardize grandfathered status. These plans are increasingly rare.
Also called grandmothered plans. These can continue under the extended non-enforcement policy while permitted by CMS and the state, but they generally renew without plan flexibility.
Can use underwriting and more old-rule-style rating factors. Watch for self-funded compliance duties, 6055 reporting, COBRA/state continuation issues, stop-loss terms, and terminal liability.
The 2018 federal AHP rule was rescinded. New federal rulemaking may occur, but agents should not treat AHPs as an active federal pathway unless current rules support it.
These move employees toward individual-market coverage, which is itself community-rated. In Texas, network and individual-market pricing issues can make this a harder sell.
No Participation / No Contribution can solve participation and contribution problems during the special window, but the group remains MACR-rated.
Short-term limited-duration insurance is not ACA-compliant and can be medically underwritten. It may be a bridge strategy for individuals, but it is not a substitute for major medical coverage.
These arrangements may provide some financial help with claims, but they are not insurance, are not guaranteed to pay claims, and may exclude pre-existing conditions.
The core MACR mechanics remain stable, but the surrounding market has changed. Items marked in flux involve rules or market conditions that may continue to change.
| Topic | Status | Attendee takeaway |
|---|---|---|
| Core MACR factors | Confirm | Age 3:1, rating area, family composition, tobacco, and wellness remain the central rating factors. |
| Texas rating areas | Confirm | Texas uses 27 CMS-approved rating areas. Update old references to 26 rating areas. |
| Tobacco in Texas small group | Carrier-specific | Do not state flatly that tobacco is not permitted. It is permitted up to federal limits, but carrier practice varies and the small group wellness escape matters. |
| Transitional plans | Confirm | CMS extended the non-enforcement policy on an open-ended basis until CMS announces an end date. |
| Level-funded migration | New data | KFF's 2025 employer survey shows level-funded plans have become a major small-firm strategy. |
| Association health plans | In flux | The 2018 rule was rescinded in 2024. New rules would require fresh rulemaking. |
| Short-term plans | In flux | Federal enforcement and replacement-rule activity remains unsettled, so short-term strategy may change. |
| Individual market rates | New data | 2026 individual-market rate pressure provides a live example of what can happen when healthy lives exit a community-rated pool. |
Use these to test whether the rating rules and strategy implications are clear.
Answer: A level-funded plan. A different fully insured ACA carrier may produce a different rate, but it still uses MACR rules. Level-funded coverage can use underwriting and actual risk characteristics.
Answer: Moving from one rating area to another. Industry, gender, and medical diagnoses are not permitted MACR small group rating factors.
Answer: $1,200/month. The adult age curve is capped at 3:1 from age 21 to age 64 and older.
Answer: Industry may still matter for level-funded offers, internal tracking, and non-MACR contexts, even though it does not price the fully insured ACA small group quote.
Answer: No. It can solve participation and contribution problems during the small group open enrollment window, but the plan remains fully insured and MACR-rated.
Use these links to download the slide deck or watch the class recording.